Evil, Suffering, and Morality · Lesson 2 of 5

Free Will and Moral Responsibility

Why a world without the possibility of harm would also be a world without love.

9 min read

The big idea

Love that cannot be refused is not love. It is programming.

Imagine a world where every harmful choice is prevented at the moment of intent. Reach to strike someone and your arm stops. Form a cruel thought and it dissolves. Most people, hearing this described, do not want it — and it is worth asking why.

The reason is that such a world contains no moral agents. Nothing anyone does is chosen, so nothing anyone does means anything. Kindness that could not have been withheld is not kindness. Loyalty that was never optional is not loyalty. The value of a choice depends on its having been a choice.

This does not resolve everything, and honest Christians say so. It addresses moral evil — harm caused by choices — better than it addresses natural evil like disease or earthquakes. Those get a separate treatment involving a world with stable laws and real physical processes. Do not let the free will response carry more weight than it can bear.

Key argument

The free will defense

  1. 1Genuine love and moral goodness require the real possibility of choosing otherwise.
  2. 2That possibility entails the real possibility of choosing harm.
  3. 3A world with no possibility of harm would have no genuine love.
  4. 4Therefore permitting moral evil is compatible with a good God.

The objection

"God could have made beings who freely always choose good."

Best response

That is the serious version of the objection and philosophers still argue about it. The short answer is that if the outcome is guaranteed in advance, it is unclear the choice was real. But I will grant this one is genuinely contested rather than settled.

Mistake to avoid

Stretching free will to cover natural disasters. It does not fit well, and forcing it makes the whole answer look motivated.

Conversation move

"Would you actually want a world where nobody could ever choose wrongly? Think about what else disappears in that world."

Memory line

"A love that cannot be refused is not love."

Practice

Describe the world where all harm is prevented, and name three good things that vanish with it.

Self-check

2 questions to check the idea stuck. This one is just for you — it is not scored and does not affect your quiz accuracy. The path quiz is the graded one.

  1. The free will defense addresses which kind of evil best?

  2. Love that cannot be refused is still meaningful love.

Sign in to mark lessons complete and keep private notes

Progress, flashcard scheduling and your readiness score are saved to your account.